http://www.grahamlawyerblog.com/2010/02/27/criminal-defense-lawyer-continues-to-speak-out-on-questionable-robbery-conviction-in-spokane/ The perspective of a defense attorney Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:58:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.grahamlawyerblog.com/2010/02/27/criminal-defense-lawyer-continues-to-speak-out-on-questionable-robbery-conviction-in-spokane/#comment-49483 Steve Graham Tue, 24 May 2011 16:57:22 +0000 http://www.grahamlawyerblog.com/?p=1468#comment-49483 Yeah, I agree Dave. That was pretty low, and thanks for the clarification. Good look as this case goes to the state supreme court. thanks for coming by. Yeah, I agree Dave. That was pretty low, and thanks for the clarification. Good look as this case goes to the state supreme court. thanks for coming by.

]]> http://www.grahamlawyerblog.com/2010/02/27/criminal-defense-lawyer-continues-to-speak-out-on-questionable-robbery-conviction-in-spokane/#comment-49471 Dave Partovi Tue, 24 May 2011 16:25:31 +0000 http://www.grahamlawyerblog.com/?p=1468#comment-49471 Thanks for taking notice, Mr. Graham, we're not done fighting these convictions. I decided to comment in order to be clear that it was not me who filed a bar complaint against the prosecutor although they should have been held accountable. Instead, they filed one against me under the unspecified "other" section of Rule of Professional conduct 8.3 for offering to NOT sue the government for the civil rights violation of knowingly and maliciously lying under oath in their probable cause affidavit to keep Gassman in jail in exchange for dismissals of the criminal cases based entirely on the uncorroborated testimony of jail house snitch, Matt Dunham. Instead of accepting my "Release-Dismiss Agreement" they filed a bar complaint which was dismissed as unfounded by the Bar Association. What a chicken s#!* way to practice law. Thanks for taking notice, Mr. Graham, we’re not done fighting these convictions. I decided to comment in order to be clear that it was not me who filed a bar complaint against the prosecutor although they should have been held accountable. Instead, they filed one against me under the unspecified “other” section of Rule of Professional conduct 8.3 for offering to NOT sue the government for the civil rights violation of knowingly and maliciously lying under oath in their probable cause affidavit to keep Gassman in jail in exchange for dismissals of the criminal cases based entirely on the uncorroborated testimony of jail house snitch, Matt Dunham. Instead of accepting my “Release-Dismiss Agreement” they filed a bar complaint which was dismissed as unfounded by the Bar Association. What a chicken s#!* way to practice law.

]]>