Supreme Court Candidate Charlie Wiggins Visits Ferry, Stevens County

On Tuesday, attorney Charles Wiggins visited Ferry and Stevens County in his bid to run for the State Supreme Court.  He is running against incumbent judge Richard Sanders.  I was invited to hear Wiggins speak, but wasn’t able to attend because of my court schedule.  I would have liked to have met him, because the Wiggins / Sanders judicial race is by far the most interesting judicial race in the State.

Wiggins is a lawyer who has spent most of his career in private practice.  He was appointed by the governor to serve as an appeals court judge, but when he ran to retain his position he was he defeated in the next election.

Supreme Court Candidate Charles Wiggins

Much of the focus of his website is critiquing Judge Sanders as being unethical.  I guess the main criticisms were 1) that Richard Sanders visited some inmates on a tour of a prison, and it turned out some of the inmates had cases pending before the court, and 2) that Richard Sanders issued a decision in a public records case that set a legal precedent for a pending case,where Sanders himself had a similar public records issue.

Sanders is pretty outspoken, and sometimes that gets him into trouble.  I first remember him irritating other judges when he spoke at an anti-abortion rally.  Usually, judges are slower to publicly address issues like that.  I remember when Sanders was running for judge in 1998, he was challenged by then Assistant Attorney General Greg Canova.  The Greg Canova campaign asserted that 38 of the 39 elected prosecutors supported him.  I actually think that number was 37, because I was an elected prosecutor then, and I did not support Canova, and I think there was one other besides me.  One of the thing that irks me about some judges, is when they fail to require that the government follow the same laws as everyone else.  Sanders often writes biting dissents criticizing such government actions.   I recall reading his dissent in Hillis v. Department of Ecology, in which he called the State’s failure to comply with permit deadlines “scandalous”.   Justice Sanders was also one of two justices to side with Ferry County on its GMA issues when we went to the Supreme Court in 2005.  Justice Sanders is often hard to predict, and if you really want to know how outspoken he is, you really need to check out a good Seattle PI story here.

Richard Sanders

The story explains how Sanders was at a Federalist Society meeting in D.C. and Sanders got tired of the U.S. Attorney General defending George Bush’s treatment of Guantánamo Bay detainees.  Sanders stood up in the audience and yelled “Tyrant! You’re a Tyrant” and then stormed out.  If you want to listen to this incident, check out it out here, and Sander’s outburst occurs at 17 minutes and 28 seconds into the video.

I mentioned in a blog post earlier this month that Justice Sanders’ Facebook fan page led all other candidates, he has almost 1300 fans.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

2 Responses to “Supreme Court Candidate Charlie Wiggins Visits Ferry, Stevens County”

  • Sandborn:

    Yep, I like Sanders too. I wouldn’t want nine guys just like him on the supreme court, but ever court should at least have one guy like him, just for the good dissents if nothing else.

  • Randall Gaylord:

    Wiggins is a great choice for the supreme court. As a prosecutor, I support Wiggins because he has a judicial temperament and is a good citizen and leader. Wiggin’s team analyzed Sander’s decisions and found that “In that in criminal cases in which the Supreme Court is divided, over 350 cases, Justice Sanders has voted for the criminal defendant and against the prosecution 94% of the time.” Are prosecutors wrong on the law that often or is Justice Sanders biased?

Leave a Reply

Comments may be edited for content. Please avoid harsh language and profanity. Flaming or use of threatening language is not allowed. Adding a signature is completely optional. I reserve the right to edit or delete comments as I feel necessary. If you do not like the way your comment has been edited, let me know and I will delete it. Thanks for commenting! (It may appear that your comment does not post at first. However, it will usually appear once the administrator logs in.)

About Steve Graham
Steve Graham is a criminal defense lawyer in Spokane, Grant, Ferry, Stevens, Lincoln, and Okanogan counties. Visit his website by clicking: www.grahamdefense.com
........
Law Office of Steve Graham
1312 North Monroe Street, Suite 140
Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 252-9167
Blogs I Read
Grand Coulee Blog
..........
Seattle Trademark Lawyer Blog
..........
Missouri Criminal Defense Blog
..........
San Francisco Accident Lawyer Blog
..........
Trial Ad (and other) Notes
..........
Dallas Criminal Defense Blog
..........
Washington Supreme Court Blog
..........
Seattle Condo Attorney Blog
..........
Boat Accident Reconstructionist
..........
An article about Yodle Law legal marketing which annoys me.
..........
An article about Yodle.com a marketing company annoys me.
..........
Categories
Archives
  • Mock Trial Questions Answered Here! What do you need to know? January 14, 2012
    I am not sure what to write about next. I have covered prosecutor’s opening, defense opening, prosecutor closings, defense closing, leading questions, cross exams for lawyers and witnesses, general tips for witnesses, and dealing with forgetful witnesses, and hearsay, etc. I need the readers to give me some feedback in terms of what other questions […]
  • Mock Trial Closing Arguments for the Defense Attorney October 3, 2011
    As you probably have already learned, the defense attorney delivers his or her closing argument after the prosecutor speaks. In addition, since the prosecutor has the burden of proof, he or she is allowed to speak again after the defense counsel speaks. The mock trial defense lawyer only has one opportunity to speak. Unlike a […]
  • Mock Trial Closing Arguments for Prosecution September 14, 2011
    So you are nearing the end of your mock trial, and now it is time for you to do your closing argument.  Hopefully you have given this a little thought before it is your turn to get up and speak.  Unlike an opening statement, which can be written entirely in advance, the closing argument has […]