Jeffrey Havard – Latest News

It is unthinkable that a modern democratic state would act the way that Mississippi did in the handling of the Jeffrey Havard case.  Months ago, I published a blog on Jeffrey Havard, a wrongly convicted man currently sitting on Mississippi’s Death Row. Since then, there have been a few new discoveries that make Havard’s future a little less bleak.

If you did not read my prior blog on Havard it can be viewed here: Jeff Havard. A full description of the case and its defenses can be found there.

In 2002, an Adams county Mississippi Jury convicted Havard of capital murder of his ex-girlfriends 6-month-old daughter, Chloe Britt. In my previous blog, I explained a number of defenses that should have been used to prove the innocence of Havard, many of which were either denied by the court, or not implemented by the defense team.Jeffrey Havard

According to former Supreme Court Justice Oliver Diaz, one of two Justices that ruled to throw out the case in a 2006 appeal, Havard was misrepresented by his public defender because he could not afford a second exam.

Havard was denied his own expert autopsy and forced to use the autopsy of Steven Hayne, a self reported expert in sexual assault and the main expert for the state of Mississippi for the years between 1987 and 2008.

Hayne’s practice and “expert” opinion has recently come under fire, giving Havard a small but strong fighting chance.

Between the years of 1987 and 2008 Hayne claimed that he performed 1,700 autopsies a year. 1,700 autopsies a year means that he would have had to perform 4.5 autopsies a day, seven days a week, with no vacation for 21 years straight. The National Association of Medical Examiners forbids anyone from performing more than 325 autopsies in a year.

Why this was overlooked and not accounted before is unknown.

Two cases similar to Havard’s were thrown out, because Hayne’s testimony was proved to be untrue.

Levon Brooks and Kennedy Brewer both spent more than 15 years in prison for a conviction based on Haynes testimony.

Brooks was convicted in 1990 for rape and murder of his ex-girlfriends 3-year-old daughter and Brewer was also convicted of rape and murder of his girlfriend’s 3-year-old daughter in 1995.

In both Brooks and Brewer’s trials, Hayne and forensic dentist Michael West testified that they found men’s teeth marks on the victims. However, the Innocence Project uncovered DNA evidence that proved Hayne and West were both incorrect.

Brooks and Brewer were both exonerated by a judge in 2008 because Hayne’s testimony was found to be incorrect.Steven Hayne

Following the findings and exonerating of Brooks and Brewer, the State of Mississippi removed Hayne from his post as state pathologist. Which now strikes the attention of hundreds of other convictions that are now in jeopardy of credibility.

The clock is still ticking, Havard has been on death row for 10 years now and his execution date is steadily creeping closer and closer.

According to Diaz ,the Mississippi Justice System in the last couple years have taken steps in the right direction to fix the problems left behind by Hayne. However, it is evident that the problems lie much deeper than just what the surface entails. There could be hundreds of innocent inmates in the Mississippi Justice System that are simply victims to the malpractice of one individual pretending to play doctor.

What do you think about the Havard case?  Is there a more clear-cut case of innocence on death row today?

9 Responses to “Jeffrey Havard – Latest News”

  • Lori Howard:

    Jeff Havard’s case is unfortunate in many ways. Not only was his trial a sham. His defense counsel either had no idea what they were doing or just did not case about the life of this man.

    I have read everything available to me on the case and am dumbfounded that he was convicted initially.

    That Hayne ran rampant through the MS Justice System for so many years is especially disturbing as I do not believe that this was an problem that went unnoticed for over 20 years.

    Jeffrey Havard is my friend. That his case is less bleak due to these new discoveries is what I am counting on.

    An innocent man deserves his freedom.

  • Excellent article Steve. Thank you. I will feature links to this article on and

  • sherry Q. Lincoln:

    I have NO doubt Jeffrey Havard is innocent! He is a true victim of a system that is anything but just! Considering the corrupt practices by Haynes, Mississippi needs to stop all executions and get to work on righting their tremdous wrongs, and giving Jeffrey Harvard and others like him their lives back!!!

  • Randi Juarez:

    Thank you for posting this wonderful article Steve. Jeffrey’s case has baffled me from the beginning. How a man could be sentenced to death without a proper trial and the fact that Hayne was allowed to testify at all, in all honesty, angers me. Jeff deserves his freedom and he deserved it yesterday. Free Jeffrey Havard and let him go home to his family and friends, where he belongs.

  • We should demand a moratorium in executions in Mississippi until all these cases can be re-examined.

  • lauren b:

    While i haven’t heard much on Jeffrey’s case , I have heard the story of this quack M.E. and his dentist buddy. The dentist, west, tried to claim he could ID a murderer based on bite mark evidence – the teeth marks in what remained of a sandwich left at the crime scene! When asked why the evidence wasn’t saved, West didn’t reply that “it was a food stuff that would eventually rot”, instead he replied that he was the only dentist qualified or able to see ID the bite marks, so there was no use in having any other ‘expert’ look at it. This just seems like a terrible movie plot. To think people have been put away by their evidence is simply unbearable.

  • This entire case is a farce, and he was convicted (basically) off the “non-expert” testimony of ER nurses — nurses who screwed up every single step of the necessary procedures and protocols to follow when a 6 month old baby is taken in as a patient.

    The Medical Examiner, Hayne, mentioned nothing of sexual abuse other than to say “it’s possible”. To me, this doesn’t meet the burden of proof of “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

    Jeff was convicted by these ER nurses, a manipulative prosecutor, and an overzealous, revenge-hungry, local lynch mob. It’s tragic and must be addressed sooner rather than later.

Leave a Reply

Steve Graham is a criminal defense lawyer, and he splits his time between Spokane and Seattle, Washington. Visit his website by clicking:
Law Office of Steve Graham
1312 North Monroe Street, #140
Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 252-9167
Blogs I Read